Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

LIFE at Home

 
A strong LIFE at Home means community leaders and residents understand and address the needs of people who are vulnerable due to their age or restricting conditions. All members of the community have the opportunity to be safe from abuse and neglect, be involved in the community through leisure activities, employment, and education, receive needed supportive care, and utilize affordable and quality childcare.

The following were identified in the 2021 Brown County LIFE Study: 
Areas of strength:
-- Most consider Brown County an excellent or good place to raise a family.
Areas of opportunity:
-- There are concerns about safety in the life of those with disability.
-- Affordable childcare remains a deficiency.

Below are relevant data indicators to provide additional context.
 

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

LIFE Study Data

LIFE Study Data

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of affordability of adequate housing to meet our needs? County: Brown

Current Value:

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of affordability of adequate housing to meet our needs? County: Brown

7.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Brown (7.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (3.0%).
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of living together as neighbors? County: Brown

Current Value:

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of living together as neighbors? County: Brown

67.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Brown (67.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (81.0%).
Prior Value
(81.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of a place where people with low incomes can meet their basic needs for things such as food and housing? County: Brown

Current Value:

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of a place where people with low incomes can meet their basic needs for things such as food and housing? County: Brown

38.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Brown (38.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (41.0%).
Prior Value
(41.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

National/ State/ Regional Data

National/ State/ Regional Data

National/ State/ Regional Data

Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE)

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE)

Value
Compared to:

Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) County: Brown

Current Value:

Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) County: Brown

24.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 24.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.5%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to the WI Value (23.0%), Brown has a value of 24.8% which is higher and worse.
WI Value
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the prior value, Brown (24.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (24.3%).
Prior Value
(24.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Households that are Above the Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Threshold County: Brown

Current Value:

Households that are Above the Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Threshold County: Brown

64.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 64.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 65.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.2%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to the WI Value (66.0%), Brown has a value of 64.6% which is lower and worse.
WI Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the prior value, Brown (64.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (66.4%).
Prior Value
(66.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Households Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Households Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Households Living Below Poverty Level County: Brown

Current Value:

Households Living Below Poverty Level County: Brown

10.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 10.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to the WI Value (11.0%), Brown has a value of 10.6% which is lower and better.
WI Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the prior value, Brown (10.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.4%).
Prior Value
(9.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Households with an Internet Subscription

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Households with an Internet Subscription

Value
Compared to:

Households with an Internet Subscription County: Brown

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription County: Brown

89.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 89.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.4%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of 89.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (88.1%), Brown has a value of 89.9% which is higher and better.
WI Value
(88.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Brown has a value of 89.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brown value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

Value
Compared to:

Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices County: Brown

Current Value:

Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices County: Brown

93.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 93.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 89.1%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of 93.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (92.9%), Brown has a value of 93.9% which is higher and better.
WI Value
(92.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Brown has a value of 93.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brown value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Children in Single-Parent Households

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Children in Single-Parent Households

Value
Compared to:

Children in Single-Parent Households County: Brown

Current Value:

Children in Single-Parent Households County: Brown

18.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 18.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.7%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of 18.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (22.3%), Brown has a value of 18.8% which is lower and better.
WI Value
(22.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Brown has a value of 18.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brown value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Overcrowded Households

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Overcrowded Households

Value
Compared to:

Overcrowded Households County: Brown

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households County: Brown

2.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 2.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.8%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to the WI Value (1.6%), Brown has a value of 2.1% which is higher and worse.
WI Value
(1.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Brown has a value of 2.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brown value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Median Household Gross Rent

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Median Household Gross Rent

Value
Compared to:

Median Household Gross Rent County: Brown

Current Value:

Median Household Gross Rent County: Brown

$935
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of $935 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $829 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $929.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to the WI Value ($992), Brown has a value of $935 which is lower and better.
WI Value
($992)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Brown has a value of $935 which is lower and better.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brown value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Median Housing Unit Value

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Median Housing Unit Value

Value
Compared to:

Median Housing Unit Value County: Brown

Current Value:

Median Housing Unit Value County: Brown

$226,500
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of $226,500 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $194,100 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $167,275.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to the WI Value ($231,400), Brown has a value of $226,500 which is lower and worse.
WI Value
($231,400)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value ($281,900), Brown has a value of $226,500 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($281,900)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brown value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage

Value
Compared to:

Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage County: Brown

Current Value:

Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage County: Brown

$581
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of $581 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $564 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $613.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to the WI Value ($624), Brown has a value of $581 which is lower and better.
WI Value
($624)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value ($584), Brown has a value of $581 which is lower and better.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brown value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

Value
Compared to:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs County: Brown

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs County: Brown

$1,509
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of $1,509 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,408 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,536.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to the WI Value ($1,602), Brown has a value of $1,509 which is lower and better.
WI Value
($1,602)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Brown has a value of $1,509 which is lower and better.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brown value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Median Household Income

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Median Household Income

Value
Compared to:

Median Household Income County: Brown

Current Value:

Median Household Income County: Brown

$74,066
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of $74,066 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $67,762 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $61,516.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of $74,066 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $60,831 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $52,521.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value ($72,458), Brown has a value of $74,066 which is higher and better.
WI Value
($72,458)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Brown has a value of $74,066 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brown value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

People 65+ Living Alone

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

People 65+ Living Alone

Value
Compared to:

People 65+ Living Alone County: Brown

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone County: Brown

30.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 30.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.9%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of 30.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (29.3%), Brown has a value of 30.9% which is higher and worse.
WI Value
(29.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.4%), Brown has a value of 30.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brown value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Child Food Insecurity Rate

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Child Food Insecurity Rate

Value
Compared to:

Child Food Insecurity Rate County: Brown

Current Value:

Child Food Insecurity Rate County: Brown

15.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.8%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (16.5%), Brown has a value of 15.1% which is lower and better.
WI Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.5%), Brown has a value of 15.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Brown (15.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.9%).
Prior Value
(9.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Brown value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance

Value
Compared to:

Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance County: Brown

Current Value:

Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance County: Brown

31%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 31% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of 31% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (33%), Brown has a value of 31% which is lower and better.
WI Value
(33%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (25%), Brown has a value of 31% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(25% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Brown (31%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (17%).
Prior Value
(17%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Brown value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Food Insecurity Rate

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Food Insecurity Rate

Value
Compared to:

Food Insecurity Rate County: Brown

Current Value:

Food Insecurity Rate County: Brown

10.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 10.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of 10.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (10.5%), Brown has a value of 10.4% which is lower and better.
WI Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Brown has a value of 10.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Brown (10.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.2%).
Prior Value
(7.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Brown value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Households with Cash Public Assistance Income

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Households with Cash Public Assistance Income

Value
Compared to:

Households with Cash Public Assistance Income County: Brown

Current Value:

Households with Cash Public Assistance Income County: Brown

2.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 2.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.5%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of 2.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,923 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (2.0%), Brown has a value of 2.3% which is higher and worse.
WI Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.7%), Brown has a value of 2.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brown value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Children Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Children Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Brown

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Brown

12.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 12.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.0%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of 12.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (13.3%), Brown has a value of 12.3% which is lower and better.
WI Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Brown has a value of 12.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brown value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

People Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

People Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Brown

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Brown

9.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 9.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of 9.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (10.7%), Brown has a value of 9.7% which is lower and better.
WI Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Brown has a value of 9.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brown value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

National/ State/ Regional Data

Homeownership

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Homeownership

Value
Compared to:

Homeownership County: Brown

Current Value:

Homeownership County: Brown

62.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the WI Value (60.0%), Brown has a value of 62.4%.
WI Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Brown has a value of 62.4%.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brown value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.