Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

LIFE of Recreation & Leisure

 
A strong LIFE of Recreation and Leisure means community members and visitors of all ages and ability levels enjoy regular, satisfying indoor and outdoor recreational activity for overall physical, mental, and social wellbeing, have access to clean, safe rivers and lakes, trails, parks, and other outdoor resources for recreation, and enjoy appealing options for shopping, dining, and entertainment events.

The following were identified in the 2021 Brown County LIFE Study: 
Areas of strength:
-- Brown County scores high for recreation and leisure.
-- There are quality parks and playgrounds and a perception of quality festivals and events. Titletown District is positively rated. 
-- There is an increase in local sports teams and venues.
Areas of opportunity:
-- There is concern with the availability of year-round opportunities for recreation.
-- There is room for growth in recreational opportunities for people with a disability.
-- There is concern regarding recreation post-pandemic.

Below are relevant data indicators to provide additional context.
 

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

LIFE Study Data

LIFE Study Data

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of the availability of recreation and leisure time opportunities? County: Brown

Current Value:

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of the availability of recreation and leisure time opportunities? County: Brown

77.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Brown (77.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (83.0%).
Prior Value
(83.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of quality of community parks and playgrounds? County: Brown

Current Value:

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of quality of community parks and playgrounds? County: Brown

79.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Brown (79.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (86.0%).
Prior Value
(86.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of providing quality festivals, parades and community events? County: Brown

Current Value:

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of providing quality festivals, parades and community events? County: Brown

61.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Brown (61.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (81.0%).
Prior Value
(81.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of providing for the safety of our residents? County: Brown

Current Value:

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of providing for the safety of our residents? County: Brown

81.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Brown (81.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (86.0%).
Prior Value
(86.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

National/ State/ Regional Data

National/ State/ Regional Data

National/ State/ Regional Data

Social Associations

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Social Associations

Value
Compared to:

Social Associations County: Brown

Current Value:

Social Associations County: Brown

8.2
Membership associations per 10,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 8.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 11.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 9.2.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of 8.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 10.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (11.0), Brown has a value of 8.2 which is lower and worse.
WI Value
(11.0)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.1), Brown has a value of 8.2 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(9.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Brown (8.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.2).
Prior Value
(8.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Brown value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Workers who Walk to Work

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Workers who Walk to Work

Value
Compared to:

Workers who Walk to Work County: Brown

Current Value:

Workers who Walk to Work County: Brown

1.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 1.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 2.1%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of 1.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (2.8%), Brown has a value of 1.6% which is lower and worse.
WI Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Brown has a value of 1.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brown value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2020 Target (3.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2020 Target
(3.1%)
<div>The Healthy People 2020 national health target is to increase the proportion of workers who walk to work to 3.1%</div>

National/ State/ Regional Data

Access to Exercise Opportunities

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Access to Exercise Opportunities

Value
Compared to:

Access to Exercise Opportunities County: Brown

Current Value:

Access to Exercise Opportunities County: Brown

91.1%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 91.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.8%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of 91.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (83.7%), Brown has a value of 91.1% which is higher and better.
WI Value
(83.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Brown has a value of 91.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Brown (91.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (92.0%).
Prior Value
(92.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Health Behaviors Ranking

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Health Behaviors Ranking

Value
Compared to:

Health Behaviors Ranking County: Brown

Current Value:

Health Behaviors Ranking County: Brown

27
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 27 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 54.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Adults who are Sedentary

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Adults who are Sedentary

Value
Compared to:

Adults who are Sedentary County: Brown

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary County: Brown

19.5%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 19.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.5%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to the WI Value (20.2%), Brown has a value of 19.5% which is lower and better.
WI Value
(20.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the prior value, Brown (19.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.6%).
Prior Value
(14.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Brown value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2020 Target (32.6%), the target has  been met.
HP 2020 Target
(32.6%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

National/ State/ Regional Data

Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Value
Compared to:

Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days County: Brown

Current Value:

Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days County: Brown

11.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 11.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of 11.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (12.7%), Brown has a value of 11.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Value
Compared to:

Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days County: Brown

Current Value:

Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days County: Brown

16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 16.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (15.8%), Brown has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.