Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

LIFE in Our Natural Environment

 
A strong LIFE in Our Natural Environment means community members value and practice conservation, stewardship, and protection of the natural environment, have the opportunity to enjoy the outdoors, experience clean air and water and preserve green space and implement well-managed land development.

The following were identified in the 2021 Brown County LIFE Study:  
Areas of strength:
-- We have strong support for the natural environment in Brown County, and by many measures we are doing well.
-- Most leaders perceive air quality to be high and are satisfied with progress made on the Fox River cleanup efforts. 
Areas of opportunity:
-- Encouraging conservation is an area in need of additional support.
-- Greater implementation of green practices at the city and corporate levels is needed.

Below are relevant data indicators to provide additional context.
 

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

LIFE Study Data

LIFE Study Data

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of quality of the air? County: Brown

Current Value:

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of quality of the air? County: Brown

69.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Brown (69.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (72.0%).
Prior Value
(72.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of the overall quality of public services (trash collection, roads, drinking water, recycling, etc.)? County: Brown

Current Value:

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of the overall quality of public services (trash collection, roads, drinking water, recycling, etc.)? County: Brown

82.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Brown (82.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (86.0%).
Prior Value
(86.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of the quality of the natural environment? County: Brown

Current Value:

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of the quality of the natural environment? County: Brown

74.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Brown (74.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (79.0%).
Prior Value
(79.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of the quality of the drinking water? County: Brown

Current Value:

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of the quality of the drinking water? County: Brown

73.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Brown (73.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (80.0%).
Prior Value
(80.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

National/ State/ Regional Data

National/ State/ Regional Data

National/ State/ Regional Data

Access to Exercise Opportunities

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Access to Exercise Opportunities

Value
Compared to:

Access to Exercise Opportunities County: Brown

Current Value:

Access to Exercise Opportunities County: Brown

91.1%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 91.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.8%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of 91.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (83.7%), Brown has a value of 91.1% which is higher and better.
WI Value
(83.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Brown has a value of 91.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Brown (91.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (92.0%).
Prior Value
(92.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Annual Particle Pollution

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Annual Particle Pollution

Value
Compared to:

Annual Particle Pollution County: Brown

Current Value:

Annual Particle Pollution County: Brown

3
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to Air Quality Index, Brown has a value of 3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that particle pollution levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Compared to the prior value, Brown (3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3).
Prior Value
(3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Brown value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Blood Lead Levels in Children (>=5 micrograms per deciliter)

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Blood Lead Levels in Children (>=5 micrograms per deciliter)

Value
Compared to:

Blood Lead Levels in Children (>=5 micrograms per deciliter) County: Brown

Current Value:

Blood Lead Levels in Children (>=5 micrograms per deciliter) County: Brown

1.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 1.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.8%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 66 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to the WI Value (277.0%), Brown has a value of 1.0% which is lower and better.
WI Value
(277.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the prior value, Brown (1.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.0%).
Prior Value
(1.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Brown value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Houses Built Prior to 1950

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Houses Built Prior to 1950

Value
Compared to:

Houses Built Prior to 1950 County: Brown

Current Value:

Houses Built Prior to 1950 County: Brown

13.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 13.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.4%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of 13.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (23.9%), Brown has a value of 13.9% which is lower and better.
WI Value
(23.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Brown has a value of 13.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brown value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Lyme Disease Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Lyme Disease Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Lyme Disease Incidence Rate County: Brown

Current Value:

Lyme Disease Incidence Rate County: Brown

75.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 75.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 145.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 235.5.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to the WI Value (90.4), Brown has a value of 75.6 which is lower and better.
WI Value
(90.4)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.8), Brown has a value of 75.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Brown (75.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (28.9).
Prior Value
(28.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Brown value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Number of Extreme Precipitation Days

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Number of Extreme Precipitation Days

Value
Compared to:

Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Brown

Current Value:

Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Brown

1
Days
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Brown (1) is less and better than the previously measured value (27).
Prior Value
(27)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Brown value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

PBT Released

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

PBT Released

Value
Compared to:

PBT Released County: Brown

Current Value:

PBT Released County: Brown

5,257
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Brown (5,257) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4,427).
Prior Value
(4,427)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Brown value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Physical Environment Ranking

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Physical Environment Ranking

Value
Compared to:

Physical Environment Ranking County: Brown

Current Value:

Physical Environment Ranking County: Brown

23
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 23 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 54.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air

Value
Compared to:

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air County: Brown

Current Value:

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air County: Brown

63,688
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Brown (63,688) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (43,444).
Prior Value
(43,444)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Brown value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.