Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

A Safe LIFE

 
A Safe LIFE means community members and visitors of all ages, abilities, and income levels are safe from harm or neglect in their own homes and communities, view their schools, neighborhoods, communities, and the Brown County area as safe, have confidence in law enforcement, emergency services, disaster protection response and fire, receive the support they need if they are a victim of crime, and are aware of and engage in prevention and early intervention efforts.

The following were identified in the 2021 Brown County LIFE Study:  
Areas of strength:
-- Brown County is perceived as safe. There are excellent emergency services and policies that prevent crime, but some remain concerned that the county has not adequately prepared for natural disasters.
-- Local law enforcement is rated positively.
 Areas of opportunity:
-- There are concerns with violence in the home.

Below are relevant data indicators to provide additional context.
 

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

LIFE Study Data

LIFE Study Data

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of providing for the safety of our residents? County: Brown

Current Value:

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of providing for the safety of our residents? County: Brown

81.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Brown (81.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (86.0%).
Prior Value
(86.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of the overall quality of law enforcement in your community? County: Brown

Current Value:

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of the overall quality of law enforcement in your community? County: Brown

79.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Brown (79.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (89.0%).
Prior Value
(89.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of providing quality emergency services such as fire and ambulance services? County: Brown

Current Value:

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of providing quality emergency services such as fire and ambulance services? County: Brown

87.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Brown (87.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (43.0%).
Prior Value
(43.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of caring for vulnerable persons (like children, the elderly, and persons with disabilities)? County: Brown

Current Value:

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of caring for vulnerable persons (like children, the elderly, and persons with disabilities)? County: Brown

54.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Brown (54.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (64.0%).
Prior Value
(64.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

National/ State/ Regional Data

National/ State/ Regional Data

National/ State/ Regional Data

Violent Crime Rate

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Violent Crime Rate

Value
Compared to:

Violent Crime Rate County: Brown

Current Value:

Violent Crime Rate County: Brown

225.2
Crimes per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 225.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 143.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 190.8.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to the WI Value (298.2), Brown has a value of 225.2 which is lower and better.
WI Value
(298.2)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the prior value, Brown (225.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (231.0).
Prior Value
(231.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Brown value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Value
Compared to:

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths County: Brown

Current Value:

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths County: Brown

36.5%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 36.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.8%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of 36.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (35.1%), Brown has a value of 36.5% which is higher and worse.
WI Value
(35.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Brown has a value of 36.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Brown (36.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.9%).
Prior Value
(37.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Brown value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Health Behaviors Ranking

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Health Behaviors Ranking

Value
Compared to:

Health Behaviors Ranking County: Brown

Current Value:

Health Behaviors Ranking County: Brown

27
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 27 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 54.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Adults who Binge Drink

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Adults who Binge Drink

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Binge Drink County: Brown

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink County: Brown

23.2%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 23.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.7%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 54 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to the WI Value (23.4%), Brown has a value of 23.2% which is lower and better.
WI Value
(23.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the prior value, Brown (23.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.0%).
Prior Value
(25.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Brown value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2020 Target (24.2%), the target has  been met.
HP 2020 Target
(24.2%)
<div>The Healthy People 2020 national health target is to reduce the proportion of adults aged 18 years and older engaging in binge drinking during the past 30 days to 24.2%.</div>

Households that are Above the Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Threshold County: Brown

Current Value:

Households that are Above the Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Threshold County: Brown

64.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 64.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 65.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.2%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to the WI Value (66.0%), Brown has a value of 64.6% which is lower and worse.
WI Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the prior value, Brown (64.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (66.4%).
Prior Value
(66.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Households Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Households Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Households Living Below Poverty Level County: Brown

Current Value:

Households Living Below Poverty Level County: Brown

10.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 10.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to the WI Value (11.0%), Brown has a value of 10.6% which is lower and better.
WI Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the prior value, Brown (10.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.4%).
Prior Value
(9.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Children Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Children Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Brown

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Brown

12.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 12.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.0%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of 12.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (13.3%), Brown has a value of 12.3% which is lower and better.
WI Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Brown has a value of 12.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brown value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to All Drug Overdose

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to All Drug Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to All Drug Overdose County: Brown

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to All Drug Overdose County: Brown

26.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the WI Value (32.2), Brown has a value of 26.0 which is lower and better.
WI Value
(32.2)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the prior value, Brown (26.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.5).
Prior Value
(21.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Brown value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Opioid Overdose

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Opioid Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Brown

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Opioid Overdose County: Brown

22.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the WI Value (26.3), Brown has a value of 22.5 which is lower and better.
WI Value
(26.3)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the prior value, Brown (22.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.5).
Prior Value
(22.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Brown value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.