Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

LIFE at Work

 

A strong LIFE at Work means community members of all types experience an economy that offers a lifelong continuum of job and career training opportunities, pathways from school to work, employment opportunities that enable them to support an acceptable quality of life and for their families for themselves, a growing economy that attracts and maintains an available, skilled, and motivated workforce, and a regional vision of economic growth that is explicit, widely shared, and pursued.


The following were identified in the 2021 Brown County LIFE Study: 
Areas of strength:
-- Most community leaders believe the revitalization progress in downtown Green Bay is going well and encourage continued efforts.
-- There is strong support for entrepreneurship. 
Areas of opportunity:
-- Few community leaders think Brown County does an excellent job of retaining young professionals, while 43 percent think it does a fair or poor job.
-- Flexible work continues to be an increasing need.
-- Wages are not competitive and remain below state averages.

Below are relevant data indicators to provide additional context.
 

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

LIFE Study Data

LIFE Study Data

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of a place that meets the employment needs of you and your family? County: Brown

Current Value:

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of a place that meets the employment needs of you and your family? County: Brown

68.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Brown (68.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (72.0%).
Prior Value
(72.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of the overall transportation system (roads, traffic, bus service, bike trails) in meeting your needs to get to work? County: Brown

Current Value:

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of the overall transportation system (roads, traffic, bus service, bike trails) in meeting your needs to get to work? County: Brown

47.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Brown (47.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (66.0%).
Prior Value
(66.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of providing quality affordable child care? County: Brown

Current Value:

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of providing quality affordable child care? County: Brown

29.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Brown (29.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (31.0%).
Prior Value
(31.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of building a strong economy? County: Brown

Current Value:

How would you rate the Brown County area in terms of building a strong economy? County: Brown

72.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Brown (72.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (76.0%).
Prior Value
(76.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

National/ State/ Regional Data

National/ State/ Regional Data

National/ State/ Regional Data

Size of Labor Force

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Size of Labor Force

Value
Compared to:

Size of Labor Force County: Brown

Current Value:

Size of Labor Force County: Brown

141,956
Persons
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Brown (141,956) is less and worse than the previously measured value (142,813).
Prior Value
(142,813)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Brown value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Per Capita Income

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Per Capita Income

Value
Compared to:

Per Capita Income County: Brown

Current Value:

Per Capita Income County: Brown

$39,091
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of $39,091 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $36,517 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $33,601.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of $39,091 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,340 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,112.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value ($40,130), Brown has a value of $39,091 which is lower and worse.
WI Value
($40,130)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Brown has a value of $39,091 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brown value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Total Employment

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Total Employment

Value
Compared to:

Total Employment County: Brown

Current Value:

Total Employment County: Brown

139,289
Paid Employees
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Brown (139,289) is less  than the previously measured value (143,640).
Prior Value
(143,640)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Brown value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Total Employment Change

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Total Employment Change

Value
Compared to:

Total Employment Change County: Brown

Current Value:

Total Employment Change County: Brown

-3.0%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of -3.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than -3.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -4.9%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of -3.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than -2.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -5.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (-3.1%), Brown has a value of -3.0% which is higher and better.
WI Value
(-3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (-4.3%), Brown has a value of -3.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(-4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Brown (-3.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (-2.4%).
Prior Value
(-2.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Brown value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Median Household Income

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Median Household Income

Value
Compared to:

Median Household Income County: Brown

Current Value:

Median Household Income County: Brown

$74,066
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of $74,066 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $67,762 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $61,516.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of $74,066 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $60,831 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $52,521.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value ($72,458), Brown has a value of $74,066 which is higher and better.
WI Value
($72,458)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Brown has a value of $74,066 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brown value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force

Value
Compared to:

Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force County: Brown

Current Value:

Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force County: Brown

2.4%
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 2.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.0%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of 2.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (2.8%), Brown has a value of 2.4% which is lower and better.
WI Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.1%), Brown has a value of 2.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Brown (2.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.6%).
Prior Value
(2.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Brown value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Value
Compared to:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force County: Brown

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force County: Brown

64.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 64.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.6%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of 64.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (62.0%), Brown has a value of 64.4% which is higher and better.
WI Value
(62.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Brown has a value of 64.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brown value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

National/ State/ Regional Data

Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Value
Compared to:

National/ State/ Regional Data

Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Value
Compared to:

Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force County: Brown

Current Value:

Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force County: Brown

66.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Brown has a value of 66.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 61.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.0%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Brown has a value of 66.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (63.4%), Brown has a value of 66.3% which is higher and better.
WI Value
(63.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Brown has a value of 66.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brown value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.